SKIP_TO_CONTENT
SSD-PEDIASYS.1994 / WORKING DEF
CMA_FIELD_INDEX.SYS[00:ROOT]

> OPEN /FIELDS/CMA.DEF

Field Definition // SSD-PEDIA KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM

Computational Media Art

A working definition for artistic practices in which computational processes participate materially in the work.

LIVE SCHEMATICCH. 01—04
01 / WHAT IS CMAFILE: CMA_DEF.TXT · READ

Definition.

Computational Media Art refers to a public-facing artistic practice in which computational elements make a significant contribution to at least one constitutive phase of the work—inspiration, collection, operation, or exhibition—and thereby shape its form and meaning.

CMA = Artistic Practice × Significant Computational Participation × Public Accessibility

Public Accessibility means that a work enters a public cultural field where others can view, experience, participate in, or discuss it. It does not mean “public domain” in the copyright sense.

02 / COMPUTATION X PRACTICEFILE: CMA_PRACTICE.LST · READ

Four constitutive phases.

CMA is not defined by a single device or medium. It is identified by where computation materially enters artistic practice: as concept, as captured material, as operative process, or as audience-facing exhibition system.

  1. 01INSPIRATION — AI, databases, network systems, algorithmic logic, simulation, software systems, platform logics, computational culture, or digital archives directly shape the work’s theme, question, motive, or problem framing.
  2. 02COLLECTION — cameras, sensors, motion capture, microphones, EEG or biometric capture, datasets, network scraping, digital archives, audience input, satellite imagery, or surveillance footage materially feed the work.
  3. 03OPERATION — AI/ML, algorithms, software logic, coding, generative systems, simulation, rendering, data visualization, computer vision, real-time computation, procedural systems, robotic control, or model-based processing produce or transform the work.
  4. 04EXHIBITION — interactive screens, multi-screen systems, immersive projection, XR/VR/AR/MR, real-time interfaces, game engines, sensor-feedback systems, network interfaces, web-based display, server/cloud systems, remote participation, robots, or live computational interfaces shape the public encounter.

NOTE: Ordinary documentation, generic technology mentions, routine video playback, ordinary projection, digital editing, or simple web archiving are not sufficient unless computation shapes the concept, material, process, or encounter of the work.

03 / CORPUS AND METHODFILE: CMA_CORPUS.LOG · READ

Why measure CMA as a field pattern?

This section tests whether the CMA definition appears as a visible pattern in contemporary technology-art venues, rather than as a purely theoretical category.

The corpus covers works and projects published from 2020 to 2025 across Ars Electronica Prix, SIGGRAPH Art Papers, SIGGRAPH Art Gallery, SIGGRAPH Asia Art Papers, and SIGGRAPH Asia Art Gallery.

01 / CORPUS

671 artwork or project records collected from selected top venues.

02 / RANGE

Six annual datasets, 2020–2025, grouped by source venue and track.

03 / METHOD

Metadata and descriptions were organized into a database, then read through the CMA rubric.

04 / RULE

isCMA is true if at least one feature is present: inspiration, collection, operation, or exhibition.

METHOD NOTE: Classification is AI-assisted and rubric-based, then manually reviewed. Results remain conditioned by source metadata, abstracts, venue track differences, and the available description of each work.

04 / STATISTICAL RESULTSFILE: CMA_RESULTS.ASC · READ

CMA statistical visualization.

The figures below use ASCII data drawings instead of conventional charts. They keep year, source, and feature differences visible so the corpus is not collapsed into a single undifferentiated total.

[ FIGURE 01 ] CMA BY YEAR / SOURCE TRACK

Each row shows the number of works classified as CMA within a source track. The yearly total at right reports isCMA / all records.

LEGEND: █ ARS  ▓ SIG-GALLERY  ▒ SIG-PAPER  ░ SA-PAPER  ▫ SA-GALLERY

2025  ███████████████████████████████████████████ 47
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 16
      ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ 17
      ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 29
      ▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫ 16     TOTAL 125 / 127  98.4%

2024  █████████████████████████████████ 33
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 12
      ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ 14
      ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 24
      ▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫ 18     TOTAL 101 / 106  95.3%

2023  ██████████████████████████████████████████ 42
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 13
      ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ 13
      ░░░░░░░░░░░░ 12
      ▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫ 22   TOTAL 102 / 110  92.7%

2022  █████████████████████████████████████████ 41
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 09
      ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ 15
      ░ [NO ART-PAPER TRACK]
      ▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫ 24 TOTAL 089 / 095  93.7%

2021  ███████████████████████████████████████████ 43
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 14
      ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ 11
      ░ [NO ART-PAPER TRACK]
      ▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫ 15       TOTAL 083 / 089  93.3%

2020  ████████████████████████████████████████████ 44
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 12
      ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ 14
      ░ [NO ART-PAPER TRACK]
      ▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫▫ 66
                                                    TOTAL 136 / 144  94.4%

[ FIGURE 02 ] SINGLE FEATURE COVERAGE BY YEAR

Feature coverage is not exclusive: one work may contain several features. The pattern shows which phase of practice most often carries computation.

I = Inspiration / C = Collection / O = Operation / E = Exhibition

2025  I ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐     100/127  78.7%
      C ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐          079/127  62.2%
      O ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐ 120/127  94.5%
      E ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐        087/127  68.5%

2024  I ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐       081/106  76.4%
      C ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐            061/106  57.5%
      O ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐    096/106  90.6%
      E ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐          073/106  68.9%

2023  I ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐         074/110  67.3%
      C ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐           065/110  59.1%
      O ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐    095/110  86.4%
      E ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐          070/110  63.6%

2022  I ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐          060/095  63.2%
      C ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐            051/095  53.7%
      O ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐   087/095  91.6%
      E ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐        069/095  72.6%

2021  I ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐            050/089  56.2%
      C ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐             047/089  52.8%
      O ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐    077/089  86.5%
      E ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐         061/089  68.5%

2020  I ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐        102/144  70.8%
      C ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐           081/144  56.2%
      O ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐    127/144  88.2%
      E ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐          093/144  64.6%

[ FIGURE 03 ] FEATURE COUNT DISTRIBUTION BY YEAR

This figure reads feature depth. A higher count means computation appears across more phases of the same work, rather than only as a single isolated device or topic.

LEGEND: · 0 features   ░ 1 feature   ▒ 2 features   ▓ 3 features   █ 4 features
SCALE : one mark is approximately four artworks/projects

2025 | ·░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████████████ | 127
2024 | ·░▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████████         | 106
2023 | ··░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████████       | 110
2022 | ··░░▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████████           | 095
2021 | ··░░▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████             | 089
2020 | ··░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████████████ | 144
PROTOCOL.TXTPUBLIC NOTICE

SSD is an interpretive framework, not a clinical instrument. Outputs are situated readings shaped by sources, analysts, and context.

[ ACCESSIBLE TEXT ] [ KEYBOARD NAVIGATION ] [ RESPONSIVE SYSTEM ]